Julius Caesar

All posts tagged Julius Caesar

Missing Letter Mondays – No “T” (Repeat)

Published October 10, 2016 by Iphis of Scyros

Romans

Romulus and Remus,
Sons of Mars…or somebody…
Mama wolf should have devoured ‘em.
(For everyone else’s sake.)
Lucrecia should have killed her aggressor,
In place of herself.
(Maybe I’m excessively modern?)
Scipio Africanus…
Uh…dunno…
Hannibal rued coming across him.
(Hannibal was basically Phoenician, you know.)
Gracchi received a bum deal,
As well as vicious murders
From a “noble” mob.
(Plebeians’ heroes deserved finer!)
Julius Caesar…
Surprisingly likeable, all considered.
(His nephew much less so.)
Cicero?
Dislike is all I have.
(A whole class of boring speeches. “Dislike” is mild.)
Lucius Licinius Lucullus
A name of all “L”s! How fun!
(He enjoyed having his own fun…)
Marcus Aurelius,
Revered as a wise emperor, even now.
(His son? Ack. Simply “ack.”)
Hadrian made a fine wall.
(You know, in England.)
Julian, unfashionably pagan.
Horrible pogroms.
(Less horrible scrolls of philosophy.)

Who could miss Romans?
(Seemingly many.)


MLM icon init MLM T


(Original 10/12/15)

Words Crush Wednesday – History’s First Comb-over?

Published December 16, 2015 by Iphis of Scyros

Short one today for Words Crush Wednesday, as my final paper is due today at 5pm.  (Of course, I’m pre-writing this on Sunday, but…)

Came across this in Suetonius, and couldn’t help chuckling.

His baldness was a disfigurement which his enemies harped upon, much to his exasperation, but he used to comb the thin strands of hair forward from the crown of his head, [Suetonius, Divus Julius 45, Robert Graves translation]

The question is, did it look as stupid as modern comb-overs?

wcw

Words Crush Wednesday — Julius Caesar and the Pirates 2

Published December 9, 2015 by Iphis of Scyros

Today’s Words Crush Wednesday is following up on this earlier post.

In reading the original that was referencing I found some startling differences.  In the other book, we were told that Julius Caesar was on his way to Rhodes to be trained in rhetoric when he was captured by the pirates.  However, according to Plutarch, that he was in self-imposed exile from Rome, for fear of being added to Sulla’s proscription list.  So at the time Caesar is captured, he’s already a married man (his wife being the daughter of one of Sulla’s enemies, Sulla wanted Caesar to divorce her, which seems to have started the whole chain of events), though he is still apparently quite young.  (I’m still trying to get a handle on how old he was, but birth dates in antiquity are not always known or reliable.  He may have been about 24, though.  Which in Rome was quite young indeed:  you couldn’t be Consul until you were 43, for example.)  So, rather than simply updating that old post, I thought I’d just post the relevant excerpt from Plutarch…

This remark [Sulla’s remark that in Caesar there were many Mariuses] was reported to Caesar and for some time he went into hiding, wandering from place to place in the Sabine country.  In the end he became ill and while he was going from one house to another at night, he fell into the hands of some of Sulla’s soldiers who were searching the district and arresting those who were hiding there.  With a bribe of two talents Caesar persuaded their leader, Cornelius, to let him go and then went immediately to the sea and sailed to King Nicomedes in Bithynia.  He stayed for a short time with the king and then on his voyage back was captured near the island of Parmacusa by some of the pirates who even at that time controlled the seas with their large fleets of ships and innumerable smaller craft.

First, when the pirates demanded a ransom of twenty talents, Caesar burst out laughing.  They did not know, he said, who it was that they had captured, and he volunteered to pay fifty.  Then, when he had sent his followers to the various cities in order to raise the money and was left with one friend and two servants among these Cilicians, about the most bloodthirsty people in the world, he treated them so highhandedly that, whenever he wanted to sleep, he would send to them and tell them to stop talking.  For thirty-eight days, with the greatest unconcern, he joined in all their games and exercises, just as if he was their leader instead of their prisoner.  He also wrote poems and speeches which he would read aloud to them, and if they failed to admire his work, he would call them to their faces illiterate savages, and would often laughingly threaten to have them all hanged.  They were much taken with this and attributed his freedom of speech to a kind of simplicity in his character or boyish playfulness.  However, the ransom arrived from Miletus and, as soon as he had paid it and been set free, he immediately manned some ships and set sail from the harbour of Miletus against the pirates.  He found them still there, lying at anchor off the island, and he captured nearly all of them.  He took their property as spoils of war and put the men themselves into the prison at Pergamum.  He then went in person to Junius, the governor of Asia, thinking it proper that he, as praetor in charge of the province, should see to the punishment of the prisoners.  Junius, however, cast longing eyes at the money, which came to a considerable sum, and kept saying that he needed time to look into the case.  Caesar paid no further attention to him.  He went to Pergamum, took the pirates out of prison and crucified the lot of them, just as he had often told them he would do when he was on the island and they imagined that he was joking.  [Life of Caesar, 1-2, Rex Warner translation, from the 2005 revised Penguin edition.]

It’s only after that incident that he decides to go to Rhodes for training in rhetoric, since he’s in the area.  So that’s Plutarch’s version.  BTW, that Nicomedes mentioned early on?  Caesar spent so much time there that it was assumed in Rome that Nicomedes had made a conquest of him, and he was mocked for it for the rest of his life.

Then I went and looked at Suetonius’ version of the same events, and found some very striking differences.  To start with, Sulla is convinced by Caesar’s friends and allies not to proscribe him or force him to divorce his wife.  (Though he thinks it’s a bad idea to let him off so easily, making that same remark about there being many Mariuses in Caesar.  A remark which is a bit too prescient to be creditable, in my opinion.  At this point in his career, Caesar has done nothing to show his military strength, nor to show his future favor to the populares.)  Caesar leaves Rome on military service in Cilicia, until returning to Rome after Sulla’s death…

After this revolt was suppressed, Caesar brought a charge of extortion against Cornelius Dolabella, a man of consular rank who had once been awarded a triumph; but he failed to secure a sentence, so he decided to visit Rhodes until the resultant ill feeling had time to die down, meanwhile taking a course in rhetoric from Apollonius Molon, the best living exponent of the art.  Winter had already set in when he sailed for Rhodes and was captured by pirates for nearly forty days, to his intense annoyance; he had with him only a physician and two valets, having sent the rest of his staff away to borrow the ransom money.  As soon as the stipulated fifty talents arrived and the pirates duly set him ashore, he raised a fleet and went after them.  He had often smilingly sworn, while still in their power, that he would soon capture and crucify them, and this is exactly what he did.  Then he continued to Rhodes, but Mithridates was now ravaging the nearby coast; so, to avoid the charge of showing inertia while the allies of Rome were in danger, he raised a force of auxiliaries and drove Mithridates’ deputy from the province — which confirmed the timorous and half-hearted cities of Asia in their allegiance. [Divus Julius, 4, Robert Graves translation, from the 2007 revised Penguin edition.]

Not only is the timing different, in Suetonius’ version there’s a logical motive for Caesar to want to prove himself militarily:  he’s trying to make the (Senate and) people of Rome like him again after he failed in his court case against the ex-consul Dolabella.

One more version:

Caesar was only about eighteen years of age at the time of Sulla’s dictatorship; and when a search was made for him with a view to putting him to death, not, it is true, by Sulla himself, but by his minions and partisans, he escaped from the city at night by assuming a disguise which effectually concealed his rank.  Later, but when still quite a young man, he was captured by pirates and so conducted himself during the entire period of his detention as to inspire in them to an equal degree both fear and respect.  Neither by day nor by night did he remove his shoes or loosen his girdle — for why should a detail of the greatest significance be omitted merely because it cannot be adorned in imposing language? — lest the slightest change in his usual garb might cause him to be suspected by his captors, who guarded him only with their eyes.

It would take too long to tell of his many bold plans for the punishment of the pirates, or how obstinately the timid governor of Asia refused to second them.  The following story, however, may be told as a presage of his future greatness.  On the night following the day on which his ransom was paid by the cities of Asia — he had, however, compelled the pirates before payment to give hostages to these cities — although he was but a private citizen without authority, and his fleet had been collected on the spur of the moment, he directed his course to the rendezvous of the pirates, put to flight part of their fleet, sank part, and captured several ships and many men.  Well satisfied with the success of his night expedition, he returned to his friends and, after handing his prisoners into custody, went straight to Bithynia to Juncus, the proconsul — for the same man was governor of Bithynia as well as of Asia — and demanded his sanction for the execution of his captives.  When Juncus, whose former inactivity had now given way to jealousy, refused, and said that he would sell the captives as slaves, Caesar returned to the coast with incredible speed and crucified all his prisoners before anyone had had time to receive a dispatch from the consul in regard to the matter. [Velleius Paterculus, History of Rome II.XLII-XLIII, translation by Frederick W. Shipley (in 1924)]

That one was written about 20-25 years after the death of Augustus, so it’s considerably the earliest of the three versions.  Velleius Paterculus is not exactly the greatest Roman historian (in fact, he’s routinely overlooked for being rather uninspired) but his text is much earlier than many of the others that cover Octavian’s civil wars and the reign of Augustus.  (Truth be told, I’d have overlooked him, too, if I hadn’t needed a copy of Augustus’ Res Gestae, which is in the same Loeb Classical Library volume.)  Presumably, the similarities between his version and Suetonius’ version means that they were both using (the now lost volumes of) Livy as a source, or one of the other lost early histories of that time period.  Or maybe Caesar published an account himself and it’s since been lost, but….yeah, probably not.  (Not enough troops to send hither and thither in an emotionless, impersonal, third-person narrative of epic dullness.  Why did he write his memoirs in the third person?  And with less info about what he was thinking than in the accounts of people who wrote centuries after his death?)

Oh, and that wasn’t a typo on my part:  Plutarch and Velleius Paterculus give the governor of Bithynia a slightly different name (Junius v. Juncus) and a different rank.

To me, the detail that stands out in this third version is the hostages the pirates sent to the cities of Asia.  You don’t think of pirates as doing that.  You think of polities doing that.  Was Julius Caesar really captured by pirates, or was he captured by the people of some island hostile to Rome, or one of Rome’s allies?  If it was the latter, that would explain the governor’s reluctance to act hastily.  (Or it could have been the greed Plutarch indicated.  Roman governors were known for their greed.)  Another thing that stands out is the fact that — in all three versions — he recovers the ransom (and more) from the pirates after their defeat…but does he return it to the people from whom it was originally taken?  There’s no word on that subject…

Either way, there’s no sign here of Caesar’s much-vaunted clementia.  But perhaps mercy was only for Roman citizens, not “barbarians” like the pirates.  (The Gauls and especially the Germans certainly saw no clementia from Caesar…)

But, actually, Suetonius eventually addresses that issue:

Yet, even when he did take action, it was his nature to show restraint; if he crucified the pirates who had held him to ransom, this was only because he had sworn in their presence to do so, and he first mercifully cut their throats. [Divus Julius, 74, Robert Graves translation, from the 2007 revised Penguin edition.]

While I agree that having one’s throat cut must be a more pleasant death than crucifixion, if only for the relative speed of the two deaths, I would think that true mercy would have been to let them live, personally.  As I said before, this is all very informative of the way that the Romans viewed the world.  There’s not a word against Caesar in any of these accounts — though, admittedly, they were written by post-Augustan folks, who had therefore been subjected to Augustan (and post-Augustan) propaganda their whole lives — and it genuinely seems like they didn’t see that there was anything wrong in what he had done regarding those pirates.  It’s an unpleasant glimpse into their world view.

wcw

(BTW, this is my 400th post.  I’d have done something more special than this for it, only I have a paper due tomorrow.  And another one due the 16th.)

Missing Letter Mondays – No “T”

Published October 12, 2015 by Iphis of Scyros

Romans

Romulus and Remus,
Sons of Mars…or somebody…
Mama wolf should have devoured ‘em.
(For everyone else’s sake.)
Lucrecia should have killed her aggressor,
In place of herself.
(Maybe I’m excessively modern?)
Scipio Africanus…
Uh…dunno…
Hannibal rued coming across him.
(Hannibal was basically Phoenician, you know.)
Gracchi received a bum deal,
As well as vicious murders
From a “noble” mob.
(Plebeians’ heroes deserved finer!)
Julius Caesar…
Surprisingly likeable, all considered.
(His nephew much less so.)
Cicero?
Dislike is all I have.
(A whole class of boring speeches. “Dislike” is mild.)
Lucius Licinius Lucullus
A name of all “L”s! How fun!
(He enjoyed having his own fun…)
Marcus Aurelius,
Revered as a wise emperor, even now.
(His son? Ack. Simply “ack.”)
Hadrian made a fine wall.
(You know, in England.)
Julian, unfashionably pagan.
Horrible pogroms.
(Less horrible scrolls of philosophy.)

Who could miss Romans?
(Seemingly many.)


MLM icon init MLM T


Bah.

 

Words Crush Wednesday – Caesar and Jones

Published September 30, 2015 by Iphis of Scyros

Well, it’s already 9:00 pm, and I haven’t posted today’s quote for Words Crush Wednesday, and I still have things I have to do tonight, so…uh, yeah, it’s been a weird day.  I don’t have time to figure out what I actually want to get to quoting right now — and next week is IWSG anyway — so I thought I’d pop back to a really great bit from Terry Jones’ Barbarians, which includes a lengthy quote from Julius Caesar.  (I can’t do a double block quote, so Caesar will have to be Italicized….which is actually pretty appropriate, if you think about it…)

This is from the introduction, on pages 14-5.

Of course, it was thoughtless of the Celts not to leave us much in the way of written records — they should have known  that the lack of books putting forward their own propaganda would weight the evidence firmly in favor of the Romans.  But even so, we shouldn’t believe everything the Romans tell us.  Here, for example, is Julius Caesar’s considered opinion about elks.  Elks, the great statesman and general informs us, are

destitute of horns, and have legs without joints and ligatures; nor do they lie down for the purpose of rest, nor, if they have been thrown down by any accident, can they raise or lift themselves up.  Trees serve as beds to them; they lean themselves against them, and thus reclining only slightly, they take their rest; when the huntsmen have discovered from the footsteps of these animals whither they are accustomed to betake themselves, they either undermine all the trees at the roots, or cut into them so far that the upper part of the trees may appear to be left standing.  When they [the elks] have leant upon them, according to their habit, they knock down by their weight the unsupported trees, and fall down themselves along with them.

This interesting piece of zoological observation was solemnly repeated by the Greek geographer Strabo and the encyclopedist Pliny the Elder.  It seems to be a confusion with an identical story about elephants told by Aristotle, and which, having also been repeated by Strabo, became part of the ‘standard truth’ about elephants right into the late seventeenth century, when Sir Thomas Browne complained that, even when people could see the animals perfectly clearly, and watch them kneel and stand, the determination to cling to the security of classical authorities made them deny what was in front of their own eyes.

The Caesar quote, according to the end notes, is from The Gallic War, VI, 27.  (I assume the notes are correct, but I haven’t actually read Caesar’s war self-adulation, so it’s not like I’d know if they’re wrong.)  I love the fact that Strabo repeated the same story about both elks and elephants.  That’s classic, that is.

BTW, “Caesar Jones” would make a great character name, wouldn’t it?  I should totally use that somewhere…

EDIT — Ack, I forgot to credit the book’s co-author, Alan Ereira.  Sorry about that!

wcw

Julius Caesar and the Pirates

Published September 15, 2015 by Iphis of Scyros

I had planned on summarizing the set-up, but since I encountered it in Terry Jones’ Barbarians, rather than in the dry books I’ve been reading for class, I figured I should just quote the section in question, because there’s no way I can tell it anywhere near as well.  So, lengthy blockquote incoming!  (Oh, and the blockquote has another blockquote inside it, but I don’t think WordPress is set up to do that, so I’m putting the interior one in Italics.)  Just before this quote, he’s been talking about the island of Rhodes, and how the Romans ruined its economy, putting an end to the patrols the island used to send out to fight off pirates.

When the young Julius Caesar tried to go to school there in 76 BC he was actually captured by pirates.  He claims to have been rather a jolly captive, and to have got on very well with the pirates, after being insulted by their initial demand for a ransom of 20 talents.  He insisted they raise it to 50:

He made so little of them, that when he had a mind to sleep, he would send to them, and order them to make no noise.  For thirty-eight days, with all the freedom in the world, he amused himself with joining in their exercises and games, as if they had not been his keepers, but his guards.  He wrote verses and speeches, and made them his auditors, and those who did not admire them, he called to their faces illiterate and barbarous.

He said he would have them crucified, and they all laughed.

Once his ransom was paid and he was freed, he hired a fleet, set out in a hot pursuit and captured ‘most of them’.  After handing them over to the authorities, he personally arranged their crucifixion.  Caesar then went on with his planned course of study.

The quote in the middle is from Plutarch, but obviously the original source of the story was from Gaius Iulius Caesar himself.  So he personally spread this story about himself…though he probably tried to make himself sound a bit less horrible than Mr. Jones makes him sound.  (For that matter, even Plutarch’s version isn’t terribly flattering, considering the insults he hurls at the pirates who don’t like his speeches and verses…which he was writing before being trained in oratory by the teachers on Rhodes.  Not to mention that I remember hearing classmates who were translating Caesar complaining that his Latin was actually pretty bad.  (Though I don’t know what their basis of comparison was.))

What gets me about this story, of course, is that we probably have very little proof that any of it actually happened.  We know Caesar said it happened, and that people believed him, but do we have records from Rhodes about the incident?  Letters to his father asking for the ransom?  Letters from the pirates begging to be freed from their prisoner?  (Okay, yeah, that’s unlikely, I know.  Something about the story puts me in mind of a more gruesome twist on “The Ransom of Red Chief” though…)  If one had the time, and the access, it would be interesting to find out if there’s any surviving corroborating evidence, or if we only have Caesar’s (and later Plutarch’s) word for it.

Now, if Caesar himself was writing about it and saying it happened, then it probably did.  Too many people would have known it hadn’t happened; if he was lying entirely, they likely would have called him on it, seeing as he had a lot of enemies in Rome.  But there are a lot of details that did not necessarily happen the way he said they happened.

For example, Jones (and/or his co-author Alan Ereira) suggests that Caesar might have cut a deal with one of the pirates to help him capture the others, a fact that he conveniently left out of his version of the story.  I would suggest that there are also any number of other little ways he could have sidestepped around the matter to make himself sound better.  Without having read Caesar’s original version, I can’t say exactly what they were, of course.  But, for example, maybe he played much less of a role in their capture than he let on.  Or, even more likely, maybe he wasn’t such a brave and commanding captive, but acted more like a normal person would when kidnapped.  He would have been in his mid-twenties, so he was probably not acting like a frightened child (unlike his nephew/adopted son, Julius Caesar actually was a force to be reckoned with on the battlefield, so he probably had no shortage of bravery by that point in his life), but he could have been tied up and helpless the whole time for all we know.  After all, any pirates who had escaped with their lives would hardly have called him on it if he’d been lying!

But it would seem that people accepted the story as fact.  (Plutarch was not the type to recount a story he didn’t believe, especially not without labeling it as such.  That’s why his Lives are treated with respect by modern historians, despite that many of them took place a number of centuries before he was born.)  This tells us a lot about what kind of person Julius Caesar was, that they accepted without question that he could behave in such a close manner with a group of pirates, and then calmly, callously put them all to death in a horrible fashion.

And most likely his audience thought he was great and noble for having done so, which tells us a lot about what the Romans were like.

But I find myself wondering about those pirates.  Who were they?  Where did they come from?  What made them pick Caesar in particular to be their hostage?  Rhodes was the place for Roman youths to learn oratory, and they all would have been fairly wealthy if they could make that trip, so there should have been any number of potential abductees available to them.  Honestly, I half suspect that they weren’t so much the “attack on the open seas” kind of pirates, but more like the pirates in the Dionysos myth I related last week, who claimed to be giving him passage, and then held him to ransom.  Of course, without having read either Caesar’s or Plutarch’s full version of the tale, I could be totally wrong about that.  Though that, too, is one of the places Caesar might have fudged his story; if he’d accidentally bought his passage on a pirate ship, surely he wouldn’t just admit it!

Even further, I wonder about what it was like for the pirates, while they were holding him prisoner.  If we decide to suspend disbelief and accept Caesar’s/Plutarch’s word about the way he behaved, what did the pirates think of that?  If he was “joining in their exercises and games,” they might have been fooled into thinking he was becoming their friend; they might have genuinely believed he was joking when he said that he’d have them all crucified.  (Even before Stockholm’s Syndrome was given its name, it must have already existed.)  How betrayed must they have felt when they found out he was serious about putting them to death?  After all, if there’s any truth to the account, then they were the ideal abductors, doing nothing to harm or even constrain their captive.

Anyway, I’m pretty sure Plutarch’s account of Caesar’s life is on the reading list for the Roman history class I’m taking this semester, so I’ll probably return to this topic (and/or just edit this post) later in the semester, after I’ve read it.  But I think there’s the potential there to make some really interesting historical fiction.  For those with the time and skill to write it, anyway.  (Which sadly leaves me right out.)

Vocaloid Tarot

Vocaloid, UTAU and Tarot; individually or all-in-one

Matthew Meyer

the yokai guy

Arwen's Butterflies and Things

My BJD creation blog. Here's where my sewing creations and projects are showcased. Some outfits are for sale. Please use the tags & catagories to navigate this blog. I love comments and reviews!

History From Below

Musings on Daily Life in the Ancient and Early Medieval Mediterranean By Sarah E. Bond

The Bloggess

Like Mother Teresa, only better.

My Tiny Joy

Where little things matter!

Klein's Other Toys

Comics, Funko Pops and Anime figures oh my!

BINARYTHIS

EVERYTHING YOU ALWAYS WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT GENDER BUT WERE TOO AFRAID TO ASK

Creating Herstory

Celebrating the women who create history

Kicky Resin

BJDs et al

Lala Land

(>°~°)><(°~°<)

A'Cloth the World

Where Textiles, Fashion, Culture, Communication and Art Come Together.

starshiphedgehog

Occasionally my brain spurts out ideas and this is where I put them

The Social Historian

Adventures in the world of history

medievalbooks

Erik Kwakkel blogging about medieval manuscripts

Sara Letourneau

Poet. Freelance editor and writing coach. SFF enthusiast.

Zounds, Alack, and By My Troth

A tragical-comical-historical-pastoral webcomic by Ben Sawyer

Project Doll House

never too old to play with dolls

knotted things

All about the things that I'm all about.

Eclectic Alli

A bit of this, a bit of that, the meandering thoughts of a dreamer.

Omocha Crush

Secret Confessions of a Toy Addict

C.G.Coppola

FIND YOUR ESCAPE

Onomastics Outside the Box

Names beyond the Top 100, from many nations and eras

Hannah Reads Books

This is an archival site for old posts. Visit hannahgivens.com for art, puppetry, and links to any current media commentary.

Ariel Hudnall

the writings, musings, and photography of a dream smith

Taking a Walk Through History

Walking back in time to discover the origins of every historical route on earth

SENTENTIAE ANTIQUAE

ΕΥΔΟΞΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΑ ΚΑΤΑΓΕΛΑΣΤΑ

Pullips and Junk

We're all mad about Pullips here!

Dutch Fashion Doll World

A Dutch Barbie collector in Holland

Confessions of a Doll Collectors Daughter

Reviews and News From the Doll World

It's a Britta Bottle!

Small Stories of a Twenty-Something Adventuring Through Life

DataTater

It's all small stuff.

The Photographicalist

Preserving the photographical perspective

The Daily Post

The Art and Craft of Blogging

We're All Mad Here!

<---This Way | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | That Way--->

WordPress.com News

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.